SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mike Buckley who wrote (36456)12/12/2000 10:17:35 AM
From: saukriver  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 54805
 
Mike,

You say Intel is a gorilla, but you also say more precisely that it is a gorilla of "earlier-generation PC-based chips."

As you may have guessed, I am not convinced Intel is a gorilla because of the lack of control over the architecture. Even if I bought into the "Intel is a gorilla" position, isn't being the gorilla of "earlier-generation PC-based chips" a bit like being the dominant supplier of handwringer washers or the gorilla of mainframes? Perhaps no reason to sell, but certainly no reason to buy.

Also, I am not sure you can point to many markets for other types of chips where Intel is a king. It may indeed be a prince in many and shut out of others. E.g., the markets dominated by BRCM, PMCS, TXN, etc.

saukriver



To: Mike Buckley who wrote (36456)12/12/2000 11:55:03 AM
From: Apollo  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 54805
 
P. S. By the way, I still think Intel is a Gorilla. :)


OK, so let me get this straight.

The carpetologist thinks Intel is a gorilla.

The Intel chip engineer, when asked to describe present open proprietary architecture his colleagues design into the chips, decides it is not a Gorilla.

Are you sure you don't want a re-vote, or re-count, or maybe we should change the rules as we go??????? <vbg>

Apollo