Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: donjuan_demarco who wrote (112129)	12/12/2000 12:59:26 PM
From: HighTech	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

You did not respond to my example and show me how my vote would not be diluted.

To: donjuan_demarco who wrote (112129)	12/12/2000 1:07:41 PM
From: oldbox	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Just because there are different methods of voting, i.e.- punch card, scanners, etc. does not mean that a violation of equal protection. Everyone still has the same right to cast a legal vote. What does matter is that in a "human review of the votes, or a hand count" the standards of determining what is a legal vote has to be uniform from one district to another if they have the same type of voting method. Personal responsibility is still paramount and equal protection also means equal right to fail or succeed in life.