Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave Gore who wrote (112130)	12/12/2000 1:03:47 PM
From: HighTech	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

If a standard were finally established and employed The other critical issue in this case is that any standard that the courts might set is now a new way of doing things AFTER the election. The US Const. says we resolve election disputes based on standards that existed BEFORE the election. This is the other violation of US Const. That's why I think the US SC will not set a standard and neither will it require another lower court to do what they don't think it should do. This would be making law, which the courts should not do, not the USSC or the FlaSC.