SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (122289)12/12/2000 3:48:41 PM
From: chomolungma  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
If someone makes that "standard" decision, if it's other than the "clear intent of the voter", it will be opening themselves up for lots of criticism.

But events have proven that "intent of the voter" is too vague to provide equal protection. That means the law is unconstitutional and any handcount done under it is invalid. And since you can't change the law for this election there is no valid count after the machine count. Case closed.



To: Road Walker who wrote (122289)12/12/2000 3:53:01 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 186894
 
RE:"There is still the outside chance thay they will decide that it was a mistake to hear the case, and step out. That's what they should do with a state election issue, but
I don't think they will let go of the power now that it's in their grasp."
--
I agree...
Too much ego for the USSC to throw this whopper back to FL without hearing the case...

Jim