Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (122331)	12/12/2000 4:57:58 PM
From: philipah	Respond to of 186894

Sorry to interrupt SupremesWatch Here's an article in TMF Don't Write Off Intel fool.com P

To: Dan3 who wrote (122331)	12/12/2000 5:02:30 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Respond to of 186894

RE:"I don't quite get this one. Since the votes are always counted using multiple standards (puch cards, paper ballot, optically scanned ballot, video voting machine, mechanical voting machine, etc.) what possible relevance is it that undercounts are also counted using multiple standards. If a single standard is the rule, then all the votes have to be thrown out" You're as good or better than David Boies! Then again you made a good case for just using the machine counts, short of throwning out the whole election. There is a big burden on standards....because of what you mentioned and each canvassing board setting rules. Jim