Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SI Bob who wrote (112769)	12/12/2000 4:57:28 PM
From: md1derful	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

SI BOB...you be da man...would YOU like to be president?? doc

To: SI Bob who wrote (112769)	12/12/2000 4:58:37 PM
From: Mac Con Ulaidh	Respond to of 769667

You've sunk to a new low with what goes on here, and what is said, to focus on Big. Such a clever closing phrase.

To: SI Bob who wrote (112769)	12/12/2000 5:00:55 PM
From: jraz1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Bob...that is complete BS, cuz one of the accounts you are so proud of yourself for shutting down (swisstrader) is a good friend of mine and he has absolutely no affiliation with Bigsable or any of the other folks you suggest...so before you puff up your chest too proudly, I suggest you do some better research and not look to censor those who help SI pay your paycheck...nice to know censorship is alive and well at SI!...p.s. want to boot me, who cares!

To: SI Bob who wrote (112769)	12/12/2000 5:01:22 PM
From: donjuan_demarco	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 769667

Actuall he was talking about TLC. But, as usual, you will ignore the fact that the moment he posted her TLC and others were all over bigsablepoint like ugly on an ape. You will ignore the personal attacks that are constantly directed at any democrats who post here. You will continue to suspend any democrat posters under the flimsiest of pretexts.

To: SI Bob who wrote (112769)	12/12/2000 5:02:54 PM
From: jraz1	Respond to of 769667

SI BOB...p.s. this guy was not even referring to you, but rather to Tastes Like Chicken, but seems as if paranoia runs deep here.

To: SI Bob who wrote (112769)	12/12/2000 5:08:17 PM
From: zx	Respond to of 769667

with my ignore button i was able to miss bigsable again. trash mouth. maybe next time. Not. way to go s i bob.

To: SI Bob who wrote (112769)	12/12/2000 6:08:43 PM
From: Mao II	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Bob: THere are a couple of points that I think you or SI need to address. First, this is a political thread, not a stock thread. Virtually every regular poster on this thread violates some aspect of the terms of use every single day. And you don't suspend them. Nor should you. Secondly, there is a perception that suspensions are parceled out in a biased fashion. Are they? Third, every poster on SI has the ability to screen out unwanted posters; every thread has the ability to do the same. I assume we have these tools in order to use them. We don;t need SI to save us frmo ourselves. It may make some sense to screen out touters or hypsters on stock threads -- altho, personally, I say caveat emptor -- but on a political thread SI should take a hands off approach. Period. Let people have their say, or not. With the case in point, you shut down this person's extra accounts. Fine. Treat him or her like anyone else after that. And on this thread or any other political thread leave him alone. M2