Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (129585)	12/13/2000 12:34:39 AM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570334

Ted Re..Its over.....Bush is our next president. Ted. Its over because the USSC recognized as we all here on this board have, that the vote just simply was too close for any type of recount, hand ,machine, or by mystics;, and any recounting system would have been unable to determine a clear winner. I think in the court trial, the justices asked all three lawyers what their idea of a fair standard was, none of the three, including David Booles, could decide upon a fair standard. I still probably would have favored a statewide recount, and let the best crook win, however, the USSC verdict (no matter how much of a travesty Scumbria thinks it is) should bring finality to this, and encourage reform of the voting systems so we can get an accurate count in the future. As for the talk that USSC should have stayed out, I don't buy that. Isn't that what the USSC is there for, to be the final word? If the USSC were to go and hide everytime a tuff problem came up, then what good is it?