Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should George W. Bush Concede? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: active22 who wrote (502)	12/12/2000 10:47:55 PM
From: James F. Hopkins	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 554

If they rally again tomorrow, I will short again too.

To: active22 who wrote (502)	12/12/2000 11:25:06 PM
From: Madharry	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 554

It was truly 5 to 4. the majority decision is full of it- had the florida supreme court set standards then they would have been criticized for acting like a legislature. besides if those bozos felt that standards should be imposed why did they not mandate that the first time they remanded it back to the florida supreme court. All of a sudden the supreme court is criticising the florida legislature that "voter intent " is not a sufficient standard. If they are so concerned about equal voter protection why did they not mandate uniformity across all states of voter machines. duhhh! Not only is the presidency now tainted but the supreme court as well. Those five will not be well regarded by history. They have disgraced themselves. The argument that there isn't enough time- duh, who halted the recount on friday? Its one thing to lose an election cleanly, its another when the umpires are calling balls sailing by your ears as strikes.