Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ellen who wrote (113563)	12/12/2000 11:34:32 PM
From: bosquedog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Ellen, Sorry both candidates couldn't win. Hopefully, the two parties will blend more towards the middle which is where the majority of America seems to be politically.

To: Ellen who wrote (113563)	12/13/2000 12:09:02 AM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Why the hell can't he be proud? Al Gore sought biased counting from the start, Scalia embarrassed his lawyer publically over this issue. Al Gore finished up seeking unfair counting, and the FSC almost gave it to him in some significant regards. On this point, I do believe the USSC ruled 7-2. The ordered counting was unfair. We all know it. Had he sought fairness and thus caused the FSC to fashion it, he could have gotten it done. Yippie...great victory for fairness and against Gore who sought less in court from the start. Loss for getting a fair count done, agreed. :-( Gore's fault though. In fairness, I heard it said on MSNBC I believe, that this situation was so new that Gore's tactical error could be excused...not by me honey. Get used to it, this is the ultimate truth that will be remembered. Freedom and fair countng Works! Dan B