SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (113574)12/12/2000 11:38:03 PM
From: alan w  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
But isn't that the essence of it? The supremes (7) of them believed that the manual counts granted by the FLSC unfairly favored Gore.

alan w



To: TigerPaw who wrote (113574)12/12/2000 11:45:01 PM
From: TripleT  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
>>It's not easy because the justices, most of them, didn't know what to write, they just wanted to stall.<<

This stalling is usually called a pocket veto. I have been wondering all along if that might not be the case on the US Supreme Courts ruling. They were placed in an absolute no win situation, split on a party line and with the Florida court making purely partisan rulings. I sure was glad to not be in their shoes.
TTT


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News