To: Elmer who wrote (122505 ) 12/13/2000 10:28:15 AM From: Windsock Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894 The ruling of the Supreme Court was a deeply divided 5 to 4 to give Bush the election. The newspapers this morning aren't buying the 7-2 idea that just the 5 who were in the majority asserted. Divided court finds recounts unconstitutional By Frank J. Murray THE WASHINGTON TIMES The decision, by the same 5-4 vote that had suspended the manual recounts on Saturday, was handed down five weeks after the Nov. 7 election.washtimes.com Justices' 5-4 Split Is Deep Gash By HENRY WEINSTEIN, LA Times Legal Affairs Writer The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision to block further recounts of Florida's ballots deeply fractured the court--precisely the outcome the justices, themselves, had hoped to avoid.latimes.com Supreme Court ruling apparantly seals a Bush victory BY STEVEN THOMMA San Jose Mercury News WASHINGTON -- A narrowly divided U.S. Supreme Court late Tuesday reversed the Florida Supreme Court's decision to recount disputed votes across the state.... In an extraordinary late-night decision, the court said by a 5-4 majority, ....www0.mercurycenter.com Divided Supreme Court Clears the Way for Bush Gore urged to concede after justices bar Florida recount Carolyn Lochhead, Carla Marinucci, San Francisco Chronicle Political Writers In an extraordinary late-night ruling, a fractured U.S. Supreme Court blocked the ballot recounts ordered by the Florida Supreme Court, effectively securing the presidency for Texas Gov. George W. Bush. The historic 5-to-4 decision shattered Vice President Al Gore's hopes for a recount of disputed Florida votes and all but ended the most bitterly contested presidential election in 124 years. And many more of this morning's newspaper headlines.