Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MeDroogies who wrote (87841)	12/13/2000 4:32:51 PM
From: Windseye	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 97611

The point is simply that a partisan court acted to demand a criteria not in place ever in the history of the country, and they absorbed the time that might have been used to rectify the situation and used the absence of time as a rationale for their decision... mighty catch-22ish. I think it is a bad ruling for all of us; in this instance machine counts and partial hand counts are considered superior to personal eyeball examination by the official trained ballot counters... a procedure in place for hundreds of years. Now the SC decides this is insufficient! and what timing!