Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BG Smith who wrote (114316)	12/13/2000 12:27:19 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

Let me see if I can make my point more clearly. Klock, when arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court asserted that the voters had to follow the instructions stating the voter had to check to assure the chads had punched through cleanly. Klock made this argument in support of Bush, even though numerous courts have already ruled such pinpointed attention from voters is not required. So now crosscut to Seminole County. Would Klock make the same argument that voters must follow instructions? The request forms the Republicans submitted clearly stated that they had to provide their Voter IDs. The Seminole County absentee voteres in question did not follow the instrucitons, just as the voters in other counties didn't follow instructions by not checking to see if their chads had punched through cleanly. Were the Seminole County case to reach the U.S. Supreme Court, would the court take into account Klock's argument?