Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: EricRR who wrote (122553)	12/13/2000 12:20:36 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Eric, The Democrats need him to fall on his sword. The Republicans certainly want the Democrats to believe that is the case. The feeble minded Democrats will probably fall right into the trap. The USSC court ruling was corrupt, and should not be allowed to stand. “The court, along partisan and ideological lines, voted to run out the clock on the election,” said a senior adviser who pointed out that the court had about two weeks to give the Florida Supreme Court guidance on the matter and never did. “It’s very clear a partisan five-vote majority constructed a way to hand the election to George Bush.” Justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter, Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented. In a blistering dissent, Stevens said, “Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year’s presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the nation’s confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the law.” Giving in to this would be a worse crime than the perpetrators committed. Scalia should be prosecuted. Scumbria