Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BG Smith who wrote (114384)	12/13/2000 12:59:30 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Fair enough. And, yes, it was hypothetical: How would the U.S. Supreme Court reconcile Klock's argument that the voters must follow instructions were the Seminole and Martin County cases before it. Unless outright fraud was discovered, the U.S. Court would rule the absentee ballots should count. Why? Because precedent exists all over the country stating they should count. Klock's argument was based on anti-Gore matters and not on merit. Yet another example of prejudice coming from the office of the Floridian secretary of state which did its utmost to inhibit, impede and disallow Gore's request for a recount.