Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (122619)	12/13/2000 2:37:11 PM
From: 5dave22	Respond to of 186894

Scumbria, forget Florida. It was a lost cause, w/Jeb. Had Gore campaigned, even remotely in the midwest - and just won ONE state, he would be the next president. Michigan and Pennsylvania were won before the vote. He had time for middle-America. Regards, Dave

To: Scumbria who wrote (122619)	12/13/2000 2:37:33 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Scumbria, <I'm sure that most of the 40,000 votes not counted by machines were quite clear.> That all depends on what your definition of "clear" is. Dimpled chad? Hanging chad? A hole with no chad? I'd sure like to hear your definition of "clear," since the lawyers for the Democrats didn't offer any. Tenchusatsu P.S. - I wouldn't have minded a recount of those 40,000 so-called undervotes. But without standards, the recount is even more unreliable as a machine count. Of course, a reliable recount is exactly what the Democrats don't want, since that would go against their plan of manipulating statistics.