SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kash johal who wrote (129628)12/13/2000 3:57:07 PM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574372
 
Kash,

I believe that GW is comitted to cutting cap gains.

I don't think that's the case. I think he wants to cut the marginal tax rates, which I believe would cut the rate on short term capital gains as well (I am not sure here), but the long term capital gains are already fairly low.

Joe



To: kash johal who wrote (129628)12/13/2000 5:09:08 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 1574372
 
2. Capital gains cut.

I believe that GW is comitted to cutting cap gains. One reason folks keep holding stock is they dont want to pay tax on gains.

Surely this will put huge sell pressure on the stock market.


True but it also incourages investment in stocks because they will have a better after tax return. I think if GW was about to raise capital gains rates it might cause a sell off before the rate change takes effect.

Tim



To: kash johal who wrote (129628)12/14/2000 12:35:41 AM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1574372
 
1. The probability is that the economy will tank. Just law of averages (nuthin to do with GW). We have had great years and great growth.

Kash,

The law of averages would have permitted the economy to tank since at least 1998. But I don't think that means it has to....no one is projecting losses and reduced revenues yet.

Until then, the economy still has a chance for a soft landing. The key are the feds and when they start cutting rates.

ted