To: Wyätt Gwyön who wrote (8537 ) 12/13/2000 10:30:37 PM From: EJhonsa Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34857 I've read some fairly good articles that casted a critical eye on the "irrational exuberance" that's occasionally floated around different parts of the IT industry over the past couple of years. This piece, however, was crap of the Alan Abelson/Sanford Bernstein variety.But it was important because much of the world's banking system is in hock to telecommunications companies, and the phone operators have bet the ranch on 3G being about the biggest thing since the invention of the automobile. What the Swiss auction told us was that most of the assumptions and calculations made by telecoms operators and their bankers are disastrously wrong. Without a single 3G network fully operational yet, how do we know this? All it means is that the Swiss operators placed a different value on the licenses than the British and German ones.Britain kick-started the process, raising $32.5 billion for its 3G licences. In Germany, the licences went for an even more impressive $44.9 billion, while in Italy the government collected $12.3 billion. In those three countries alone, the telecoms operators paid only slightly under $90 billion just for the right to be in business. Of course, he ignores the fact that the licenses are generally paid for over 20-year time frames, and not in one large lump-sum.These 3G phones would let your mobile make a high-speed connection to the Internet. In the euphoria of the moment, a 3G license looked like a modern day El Dorado, a fountain of never-ending wealth. Everyone had to have one. It's funny how this guy continues to draw conclusions before 3G rollouts have even gotten underway. I wonder if he worked for one of the TV networks on election night...(as well as in Poland, where the auction had to be canceled last week after nobody showed up) Did he ever consider the possibility that in a country such as Poland, which is still developing its economy after decades as an Eastern Bloc entity, the rolling out of a 3G network may not currently be economically justified even if the licenses were for free? As a result, perhaps the leading operators jointly agreed beforehand to hold off on bidding for licenses for the time being?In the annals of commercial history, the 3G license auctions are likely to go down as one of the greatest blunders of all time: a moment of collective dementia, when otherwise sane and sensible executives lost touch with the earth's orbit, and decamped to some other planet where everyone kept their mobile switched on all day, downloading films and records, buying shares and houses, and reading Henry James novels in text messages, and didn't mind paying several thousand dollars a week for the privilege. Some numbers from Arun Gera regarding exactly how many Henry James novels will have to be read over one's phone in order for the license fees to be recouped:Message 14871661 $500/pop for 20 years. That is roughly $25/pop per year. If the average penetration of 3G services is 50 percent over the twenty period, it is about $50/year per paying subscriber. $4/month. That is worth about 200-400 impressions a month of advertising. The wireless provider can recover it by just its brand-building capabilities. I wonder what might happen if people do take an active interest in "downloading films and records," or streaming them, for that matter.Mobiles are great for talking to people, and not much else. Tell that to the Japanese. Or the tens of millions of die-hard SMS users out there; or perhaps, just perhaps, wait until phones with things like large screens, always-on connections, advanced VR software, and pen recognition support start proliferating before talking about what phones are actually good for.But, as the world has discovered in the last few months, nothing on the Internet makes money. AOL, Yahoo! and eBay might have some interesting responses to that comment. So would the numerous non-internet companies that have significantly boosted their revenues via online properties. So would...oh, nevermind. Eric