SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (86841)12/14/2000 8:47:12 AM
From: Mike M2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Mike, I have seen an intriguing documentary suggesting that Admiral Kimmel was not privy to pertinent intelligence in spite of his requests for additional intelligence. In addition, there was good intelligence that was " mishandled" and ignored. Our battleships were destroyed but all of our aircraft carriers were out at sea . The aircraft carrier was the decisive factor in naval victories. I do know that FDR's cutting off the Japanese oil supply in July 1941 was a provocative act and he knew it. I do feel that critical military intelligence was at least mishandled and Admiral Kimmel was scapegoated when in reality he was misinformed either through incompetence or design. In the 1930s General Bill Mitchell warned that the US armed forces were degraded and foresaw the possibility of attack at Pearl Harbor. When Mitchell publicly charged the government with " incompetency, criminal negligence and almost treasonable administration of the national defense" he was court-martialed. Mitchell died in disgrace in 1936 but was posthumously awarded a special Congressional medal of honor. It seems that there was sufficient cause to be more vigilant than we were and I don't know enough detail to rule out the " sacrifice at Pearl Harbor" theory but the attack did serve to silence the isolationists. I recently met a guy who was on a battleship during the attack and he mentioned that the islands ammo supply was woefully inadequate. Mike



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (86841)12/14/2000 9:21:17 AM
From: Tommaso  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 132070
 
I knew quite well someone who was in charge of civil defense for the area around San Jose during World War II. He said that until the Battle of Midway there was a real likelihood of a Japanese invasion of the West Coast. It may not seem that way now, but if there had been no Pacific fleet, what was to stop the Japanese from at least trying it?