SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mama Bear who wrote (6219)12/14/2000 10:42:09 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6710
 
Anarchism, as a political philosophy, isn't the same as anarchy, "without law."

There is an overlap between anarchism and libertarianism. Individualist anarchists are quite similar to libertarians. Take a look at The Machinery of Freedom, by economist David Friedman. Murray Rothbard was an individualist anarchist.

Anarcho-syndicalists are more like socialists. Ray may be an anarcho-syndicalist.



To: Mama Bear who wrote (6219)12/14/2000 11:27:11 PM
From: moosebeary  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6710
 
Mama Bear, although some would define Anarchy as

"without law", a more common and more correct definition is "without government". Because reasnable people will always impose reasonable laws upon themselves, govt or not. Ah...but not all people are reasonable....and there is the problem. So we must go for a bare-bones govt, limited to only essential functions, as brilliantly represented by the Constitution. Anarchy equals "without govt", the US Constitution equals "the govt that governs best governs the least", or, as close to no govt as we can possibly get and still have an army and roads and a common currency.

And the Libertarian Party believes in less govt than the Constitution allows. So, yes, Anarchism and Libertarianism are very closely alligned.

Are you aware that the people who started the LP talked to Ayn Rand and begged her to come to the early meetings and preside over the fledgeling Party? They did this because the new Party of their dreams was founded on the writings of Ms Rand. She refused.

" Why not get acquainted with the facts before declaring your perceptions reality?"

Good advice, Barb. Please use it.

Best regards, Moose