Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zx who wrote (115915)	12/14/2000 1:30:46 PM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

>>>if they would have made a consistant reproducible vote counting standard from the bench the us supremes would have supported it 6 to 3<<< For the last time and this time I will try to be a little clearer. The Florida State Legislature makes the laws in Florida. The law said it is up to the canvassing boards to decide whether a vote is legitimate or not. If the Fla SC had tried to set the standards concerning what to count as a vote the US SC would have ruled they were writing laws from the bench. It is apparent now that whatever they had ruled that Rehnquist's and his 4 henchmen would have overuled them. The second ruling of the Fla SC followed exactly the US SC's first ruling of what they are allowed to do. So what if it's by the law.