Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Krowbar who wrote (116069)	12/14/2000 3:59:43 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston	Respond to of 769670

Sorry, you are wrong. 72 hours had passed. Edit: Of course following the law can be an impediment at times.

To: Krowbar who wrote (116069)	12/14/2000 4:03:09 PM
From: H-Man	Respond to of 769670

Gore said it on TV, but when it came down to the real world he argued against it. He could have asked: - the canvassing boards during the protest he did not. - During the first FSC Case Palm Beach v Harris, where the court noted that the court inquired about it and neither party expressed an intrerst. - Duirng the Contest trial with Judge Sauls he did not In fact, He argued against it in Judge Sauls court room. When Bush lawyers and intervenors argued that any remedy must include other counties, David Boise in his closing arguments argued against it. David Boise argued against it in the 2nd FSC Case. He argued against it before the US Supreme court too. You should pay more attention.

To: Krowbar who wrote (116069)	12/14/2000 4:09:16 PM
From: Master (Hijacked)	Respond to of 769670

Hellllloooooooooo...are you home but you can't get up? Gore asked for a statewide recount only after the statutory date had passed knowing full well that it would have been illegal by Florida law to hold such a recount. If you have any knowledge of laws the outcome would be predictable. If Bush would have increased his margin in the other counties, I could see Boies arguing that the recount was illegal as its request passed the statutory date. You can't have your cake and eat it too!