Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Lacelle who wrote (176)	12/14/2000 9:46:55 PM
From: E	Respond to of 93284

Clinton? FYI, I am convinced Clinton raped Juanita Broderick. I am not a Clinton fan. But I was asking about Bush. So as far as you know, I take it, he has disclosed, when asked in sworn affidavits, his arrest record. Of course, if he didn't, he's a perjurer. But I wouldn't be in favor of getting Ken Starr to look into it, even if it were discovered that he didn't disclose and was thus a perjurer. After all, prosecutors use discretion in these matters all the time, so they wouldn't have to prosecute. Would you be in favor of prosecuting him for perjury, John, if the answer to this hypothetical question were that he'd said No to the question? Of course it would be understandable if you felt Clinton should be and Bush not, because sex is much worse to lie about than an arrest record. Hypothetically, what do you think you would recommend? Prosection for perjury, or not?