Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (6348)	12/15/2000 8:54:27 AM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6710

"You shouldn't look at the dictionary" I suppose not. I agree if you change the definition of the word, then it might fit. Of course that screws up the whole point of having a language. I disagree that because some members of the Party identify themselves as anarchists that the Party's philosophy is one of anarchism. In an anarchy, there are no individual rights, because you would be forced to align with and subsume yourself to a group (gang?) in order to survive. The strong would take from the weak with no consequence. The dog still isn't meowing. Regards, Barb

To: Ilaine who wrote (6348)	12/16/2000 8:56:39 AM
From: Tom Clarke	Respond to of 6710

Yes! Lets hear it for Rothbard! His writing was a catalyst in getting me to walk away from the Democrats. He was more instrumental in getting movements and organizations started than anyone else I can think of. I'm not positive, but I think in addition to the organizations mentioned in the article, he helped get the Cato Institute up and running. I found this passage from your article amusing: In the late 1980s, however, Rothbard baffled and disappointed many of his admirers, myself included, by breaking violently with the entire libertarian movement in order to make common cause with some of the more bigoted and reactionary elements on the "paleoconservative" right, and to launch bitter personal attacks on prominent libertarians in his newsletter Rothbard-Rockwell Report. Many left-libertarians had this take on Rothbard, but it was a caricature of his views. I was a charter subscriber to the RRR and it was the most stimulating and provocative newsletter around in those days. Much more fun than the mundane ruminations in Reason or the LP News. Here is a link to the online continuation of the Rothbard-Rockwell Report. Some day soon they'll have all of Murray's writings available online. lewrockwell.com