SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VerticalNet, Inc. [VERT] -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bob zagorin who wrote (1033)12/17/2000 6:42:47 PM
From: puborectalis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1094
 
VerticalNet buys time on SierraCities.com deal
Dec 15, 2000 10:00 AM ET

By Peg Brickley, LocalBusiness.com

NEWS ANALYSIS HORSHAM, Pa., and HOUSTON, Dec. 15
(LocalBusiness.com) --
VerticalNet Inc.'s play for a Houston-based online business finance firm has
fallen short, prompting a play for more time to do the deal.

Midnight last night was the deadline for
SierraCities.com (Nasdaq: BTOB) to tender at
least two thirds of its shares to be swapped,
roughly 3-for-1, for shares in the operator of
business-to-business Web hubs (Nasdaq: VERT).

Down to the wire, SierraCities.com shareholders had tendered 12,674,851
shares, slightly short of the 12,699,093 shares needed to put the deal over
the top.

VerticalNet said this morning it had extended the tender to Dec. 29.

Clear escape plan
SierraCities.com has a clear out: The target could bust out of the buy if
VerticalNet's average closing price for the deal calculation period is under $15
per share.

VerticalNet's average closing price calculates out to well under $10 per share
for the period, using the initial tender cutoff.

Now that there's a new end-of-deal date, SierraCities.com could get a better
price, depending on which way VerticalNet shareholders jump.

At last night's closing price for VerticalNet, the Houston firm was looking at an
aggregate price of about $53 million, rather than the $133 million it was worth
when the deal was announced in early November.

SierraCities.com netted $78.8 million in a June 1999 initial public offering,
overallotment included.

First VerticalNet test for new CEO
VerticalNet CEO Joseph Galli Jr., looking at the first big deal of his tenure,
apparently passed up the chance to walk away from SierraCities.com and call
it a win.

VerticalNet shareholders booed the buy from the start. They chopped the
stock from the $29.50 per share it brought when the deal was announced
Nov. 6 to yesterday's close of $8.37 per share.

Investor distaste for SierraCities.com was a big reason VerticalNet's CEO was
forced to bring such damaged currency to the deal table, according to one
analyst.

Coming in the midst of an ongoing slaughter in the technology market,
VerticalNet's drop was more precipitous than that of comparable e-commerce
powers. Ariba, Inc. (Nasdaq: ARBA), for example, dropped less than 50
percent during the period, while VerticalNet skidded more than 70 percent.

That prompted Gerard Klauer Mattison analyst Alan Weichelbaum to blame
market reaction against the SierraCities.com deal for a good chunk of
VerticalNet's stock slide.

Few analysts applauds deal
The analyst, however, was one of a few who liked the combination.

"I think it's a great deal for the company," Weichelbaum told
LocalBusiness.com yesterday.

SierraCities.com's systems removed one of the existing barriers to
industrial-strength e-commerce: the lack of a mechanism to evaluate credit
risk and finance deals online, Weichelbaum explained.

"One of the hurdles to business-to-business transactions is that there was no
way to credit-score them online and extend them the credit," the analyst said.
"This closes the loop and this should increase transaction volume."

Now for the "but," the issue that sent shivers down the spines of VerticalNet
investors: For two to three months after the finance deals closed and a "flow
partner" could be lined up to take them on, VerticalNet would hold onto the
loans and leases.

Dangling on risky hook
The idea of the e-commerce pioneer's already chancy business dangling on
the additional hook of interest rate and credit risk -- factors that have buried
experienced finance companies -- did nothing to comfort shareholders.

"The perception of the risk is kind of overblown," Weichelbaum said. "But
finance is a very tough business. People go into it all the time and lose their
shirts. When investors were spooked by this, I couldn't blame them."



To: bob zagorin who wrote (1033)12/21/2000 1:53:08 PM
From: ColtonGang  Respond to of 1094
 
Sands Brothers Covers VERT
By: Sands Brothers
12/21/00 8:17:00 AM
Source: Sands Brothers
Investment Research:
Visit the CNET Brokerage Center for daily reports from the top Wall Street analysts.

Company Description: VerticalNet provides end-to-end E-commerce solutions targeted at distinct business segments through three strategic business units: VerticalNet Markets, VerticalNet Exchange and VerticalNet solutions. VerticalNet International leverages the company’s three strategic business units to create global Internet B2B marketplaces, offering products and services internationally and partnering with companies that have strong local presence and domain expertise. VerticalNet’s mission is to build and manage dynamic, industry-focused Internet communities with online information resources, communication vehicles and E-commerce channels for industrial, professional and technology based businesses. VerticalNet was founded in 1995 and went public via an IPO in February 1999. The company’s headquarters are located in Horsham, PA.


Quote Snapshot
VERT 5.66 0.34

· Free Real-Time Quotes

Enter symbol:

· Symbol Lookup

sponsored by


More from CNET Investor
Quotes on this page are from the time the story was published
Trade Now
with our broker sponsors



Investment Conclusion

We are downgrading our recommendation on VerticalNet from a Strong Buy to a Buy. On December 19, 2000, VerticalNet agreed to sell NECX, a global trading exchange for electronic and computer components to Converge (formerly eHITEX), a technology marketplace backed by technology companies such as HP, Compaq, NEC, Gateway, and Hitachi. The sale of NECX raises numerous questions as to the direction of VerticalNet’s business model and financial operations. The highlights of this announcement include the following:

-For the sale of NECX, VerticalNet will receive a 19.9% equity stake in Converge, as well as $60 million in cash. At the present time, no estimates have been given as to the valuation of Converge.

-In a separate announcement, Converge has signed a three-year contract to license $107.5 million in software from VerticalNet Solutions, a business unit of VerticalNet. Initially, Converge had selected Commerce One as its E-procurement technology vendor.

-At the present time, no actual guidance has been given as to how the transaction will be accounted for, future profitability measures, or to the valuation of Converge. We believe guidance will be given during the January conference call.

-Since its acquisition, NECX has accounted for over 50% of total VerticalNet revenues. We question whether the revenues lost from the sale of NECX will be made up through the value of the equity in Converge and future software license revenues from this deal.

VERT Sells NECX

On December 19, 2000, VerticalNet announced that they will be selling NECX, a global trading exchange for electronic and computer components to Converge (formerly eHITEX), a technology marketplace backed by technology companies such as HP, Compaq, NEC, Gateway, and Hitachi. In turn, VerticalNet will receive a 19.9% equity stake in Converge, as well as $60 million in cash. In a separate announcement, Converge has signed a three-year contract to license $107.5 million in software from VerticalNet Solutions, a business unit of VerticalNet. The VerticalNet software package replaces Commerce One, who, back in September, had been selected to provide auction technology to Converge. The NECX/Converge deal is expected to close during Q1’01.

Where does this leave VERT?

The selection of VerticalNet Solutions as the E-procurement platform for Converge is a positive announcement. VerticalNet was able to step in and steal business away from Commerce One in what was CMRC’s first mega exchange customer loss. We believe this deal puts VerticalNet Solutions on the map as a viable player in the highly competitive mega exchange technology provider sector. However, this deal raises numerous questions as to the future direction of VerticalNet’s business model and operations.

This sudden announcement leaves us questioning VerticalNet’s financial status. NECX represented approximately 53% of 3Q00 revenues and our current estimates had forecasted NECX to account for $160 million in total revenues for FY01. At this time, VerticalNet has not provided future financial guidance for life after NECX. We believe Management will issue guidance during the 4Q00 conference call, which should be held during the third week in January.

Management has emphasized that they would rather trade NECX’s volatile and unpredictable revenue stream for potentially more consistent revenues provided from licensing software to mega exchanges such as Converge. However, at this time there is no way to value whether these revenues will offset lost revenues from NECX.

Furthermore, though management claims that the ownership stake in Converge will place VerticalNet at the center of a high profile industry consortium, no present valuation can be attached to Converge. Therefore, no assumptions can be made as to the value of VerticaINet’s equity stake in Converge.

Management has now changed the structure of VerticalNet twice since Joseph Galli came on board as CEO. During the VERT/NECX/Converge conference call, management explained how VerticalNet would no longer run electronic exchanges and this essentially leaves VerticalNet Exchange as a business unit with no business.

Conclusion

VerticalNet’s stock has taken a significant hit since our now infamous November 7, 2000 election day, losing approximately 80% of its value. In addition, the stock has fallen precipitously from March 10, 2000, when the stock closed at a 52-week high of $136 19/32. We believe the $107.5 million software-licensing contract with Converge is a positive for VerticalNet but we are still left with a lot of unanswered questions. We believe VerticalNet stock will face near term volatility until VERT gives future guidance as to its new profitability timetable and financial outlook. At present, we are not changing our income statement model for 4Q00 or FY01 but we will likely alter our model after VerticalNet reports its 4Q00 financial results and sheds some more insight on VerticalNet’s new direction.

We believe VerticalNet was able to sign the deal with Converge based on a special/unique opportunity based on a swapping of revenue for equity arrangement revolving around NECX. We would consider revisiting our opinion on VerticalNet if the company can continue to win E-procurement business versus the “blue chip” B2B E-commerce companies such as Ariba and Commerce One but in the mean time we are taking a wait and see approach. Direct materials procurement is highly complex and specialized and a new segment of the market for VerticalNet.

Presently, VerticalNet trades at only 1.1x our current FY01 revenue forecast of $435.0 million. If the stock were to appreciate just 1x this forecast, this would imply 107% improvement to $11 per share. While our FY01 revenue forecast is likely subject to revisions, we nonetheless believe that the stock offers an attractive value at its current price.

We are downgrading our recommendation from a Strong Buy to a Buy



To: bob zagorin who wrote (1033)12/22/2000 1:15:42 PM
From: ColtonGang  Respond to of 1094
 
THE DAY AHEAD: Tech firms shift strategy to cope with bear market

By Larry Dignan TDAIN ZDII


COMMENTARY -- Tech companies are finding a great way to cope with the bear market -- change the business model and pray investors buy it.

We can hear the conversations now between top tech execs and their advisers.

Head honcho: "Our stock is in the toilet, what is wrong with us?"

Yes man: "Nothing is wrong with us, it's the market. It's the sector. It's everything. Our peers aren't doing any better."

"I don't buy that. Look at our main rival. Why are they holding on to their market cap better than we are?"

"I don't know. What do you suggest?"

"Let's retool the business and be like them."

"But our current model has produced strong revenue growth and we'll be profitable in two quarters."

"So? We need to get our stock up yesterday! We'll reposition ourselves."

"We did that four months ago, boss."

"So what? We'll do it again. Just get the stock up."







Sound off here!!



Post your comment



Latest News on VERT

THE DAY AHEAD: Tech firms shift strategy to cope with bear market...
VerticalNet hopes to run with Ariba, Commerce One...
Robertson Stephens Daily Growth Stock Update on FDRY JNIC ARTC FCS JBL SABA APW CIEN CBST SYNP TTEK ...









VERT: News Profile Chart Estimates




And so it goes. That conversation is fiction, but don't be surprised if it's taking place in plenty of companies -- especially the Internet variety.

The examples are piling up -- companies are switching business models in a lame attempt to get investors to like them again. There's a chronic case of the young and strategyless out there. News flash: It won't work -- especially in a bear market and a cyclical tech downturn.

Managing a business based on investor sentiment is a recipe for disaster, but companies are doing it anyway.

VerticalNet (Nasdaq: VERT) sold off its NECX electronics exchange to Converge Inc., an electronics B2B consortium. The company line at VerticalNet is that NECX will do better as a part of Converge.

I don't deny that. But it is odd that VerticalNet chose to dump NECX about a year after it acquired the company. When NECX boosted VerticalNet's top line by a mile for the last three quarters, no one complained.

But when VerticalNet shares went into a freefall, NECX became a problem. VerticalNet wasn't diversified enough. VerticalNet's future was software and marketplaces. Investors didn't understand the model. Etc., etc. Simply put, VerticalNet was looking for a story to sell Wall Street.

Investors still don't understand the model. Here's the evolution: VerticalNet started as a content company, bought NECX and got into exchanges, bought a software company to provide solutions, then touted its three synergy-happy business units. Now it's spinning off NECX to be a software company, leaving it with two units. Any shareholder not tracking the company daily would be confused.

VerticalNet CEO Joe Galli said the company's business model -- we're like Ariba and Commerce One -- is easier to understand. I agree, but that doesn't make it a great long-term idea. Galli, however, denies VerticalNet's move had anything to do with the company's stock price. Yeah, right. Analysts said NECX was straining to hit its growth targets because the electronics component business is volatile. VerticalNet can now hide any NECX problems in the "discontinued operations" line.

If VerticalNet traded at $70 a share, the company would have never dumped NECX.

My hunch is that VerticalNet is selling off a huge chunk of its revenue over a case of Ariba envy. Analysts reckon that the winning B2B model for 2001 will be the software licensing model, so VerticalNet is suddenly a software company. It remains to be seen whether VerticalNet, which so far has three software customers, can upend Ariba and Commerce One.

It all makes me wonder what'll happen to VerticalNet's model when analysts decide software licensing is out for 2002.

At least VerticalNet isn't alone. How many e-tailers have we seen become e-commerce infrastructure companies when they figure out they can't make money retailing? The list gets pretty long. I'm still waiting for those hot e-commerce solutions from Value America.


Take a gander at CMGI (Nasdaq: CMGI). The company had an incubator model that drove shares up into the stratosphere. The IPO market implodes with the Nasdaq and suddenly CMGI wants to be known as an operating company. Bad move, Mr. Wetherell. Your operations need some help -- just look at AltaVista and Engage to name a few lost sheep in the family.

When you listen to CMGI talk about its model, it becomes clear pretty quickly that there isn't one.

Ma Bell is also on the fluid strategy bandwagon. AT&T (NYSE: T) sold us on this dream of conquering the last mile, integrated services and broadband nirvana. The stock plunges and Ma Bell decides to split itself up amid serial profit warnings. Now AT&T is cutting its earnings targets again.

We could go on for days, but you get the idea. You won't see companies with viable business models ripping up their plans based on a bear market. The good companies will weather the storm, work their business model, grab market share at the expense of their rivals and look pretty damn good when the tech sector rebounds.

In the meantime, stay away from those companies that shop at Strategies R Us.TDAIN



To: bob zagorin who wrote (1033)1/22/2001 6:38:26 AM
From: puborectalis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1094
 
Mark Walsh,CEO,exercised an option for 36000 shares of common stock at 20 cents each on Dec 7 and now directly holds 261,070 shares...............big deal!