SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (86935)12/15/2000 12:57:39 PM
From: Tommaso  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
I guess I do wish I had put in the QQQ shorts I was thinking about, but it seemed like such fun to short the Dow. Satisfies the oedipal complex--whereas shorting QQQ is more like indulging a Cain obsession.



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (86935)12/15/2000 1:22:10 PM
From: Freedom Fighter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Mike,

>>Wayne, I liken Bush to Eisenhower. Folks complain that nothing happened during the Eisenhower years, yet they
still call those the "Happy Days."<<

He's inheriting a potential financial fiasco and I don't think he has much in the way a sound plan to begin with.

On the plus side Lawrence Lindsey is one of the few Fed guys that recognized the bubble early on and was willing to talk about it.

I think very little gets done, but I have no problem with that. Better to do nothing than the wrong things.

Wayne



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (86935)12/15/2000 3:24:21 PM
From: Tommaso  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
MB,

You know, I have been accepting the conventional wisdom for years that in-and-out trading can't make money.

But I wonder if this got rooted back when it could scost you a commission of $150 (I think) just to buy 100 shares of a $50 stock. I remember buying convertible bonds with Merrill Lynch because the commission was only $2.50 per bond.

But with round-trip trades at under $30 with a high-quality discount broker, I think it's a little different.

Well, am I heading down the road to perdition? I find that shorting and covering market index stocks brings in as much as a pretty good poker game. The governing assumption is that stocks in general are terribly overpriced.

I'm not talking about getting rich, but you know if you can rake off $200 a day that's not a bad income supplement.

Of course I could also take up mugging old ladies.



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (86935)12/15/2000 3:41:32 PM
From: Michael Bakunin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
Sure... but Ike was a competent, intelligent leader, perhaps the best the country saw (ex-FDR, who is in a class his own) this century. W is a nincompoop, through and through. -mb



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (86935)12/15/2000 5:59:33 PM
From: Joan Osland Graffius  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
MB,

It must be hard to get rid of inventory at the retailers these days. I went to the Mall of America to get my Christmas shopping done and Bloomingdale's had every thing in the store on sale for 50% off. They had some things that already had a 30% discount and today 50% on top of that. I have never seen this type of sale in my life, but I don't get out often. <g>

Joan



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (86935)12/15/2000 8:12:57 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Respond to of 132070
 
Reminds one of that old Chinese curse, "May you live in interesting times." Periods in which there is little political activism are periods in which people are not particularly upset about much; maybe they are even happy. And the converse also applies.

Our just-finished election was quite interesting. Part of what made interesting was that potentially it was highly dangerous. Like watching a cobra; you'd best pay attention.