Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (129793)	12/16/2000 2:48:00 PM
From: boris_a	Respond to of 1570290

Jim: That was mainly just more crap Thanks for the clear answer, but for someone interested in jurisprudence and the implications of this USSC ruling it's a bit unproductive. Do you know of any law commentator who found this USSC ruling a good one (despite helping her or his favourite to get president)?. Regards, Boris edit: BTW, I dont' mind about Bush or Gore. It was the choice between tuberculosis and poliomyelitis. [tm Mick Jagger]

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (129793)	12/16/2000 2:58:55 PM
From: Windsock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570290

Jim - Re:"That was mainly just more crap from a sour grapes liberal attorney" It is satirical and punishing. However, there is nothing but truth in the parts about what the Court ruled. As the guy said, read the opinion if you don't believe it. The conclusions contain the part that is hard for the right to admit. The part where the court said this ruling is good for this case only -- don't use it elsewhere -- is a real shock and absolutely true.