Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TOPFUEL who wrote (43771)	12/16/2000 2:56:36 PM
From: V$gas.Com	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 44908

Don't let her get you upset Fuel. She is just upset with her investment being practically worthless. I mean, she claims to have 75,000 shares. That's 750,000 shares, pre-split. Let's assume that her average cost is .30 pre-split. $3.00 post-split. That would be $225,000. Now we have the split and the stock is worth .52. 75,000 shares times .52 = $39,000. Wow, she has lost $186,000. Remember, this is just a penny stock. Once you put this in black and white, I can see why she is so upset and is threatening you with a suit. What's really sickening is since the split, the outstanding share count has risen from 25,000,000 to 139,000,000 (+/-) shares and she still touts this as a great company. That is the equivalent of 720,000,000 shares pre-split. In order for this to get any kind of favorable financing, I would say that TIGI will probably come to the shareholders for another reverse split. Isn't that how they justified the last reverse? If memory serves me correctly the company said that they had to have the reverse split in order to get the 'SECRET" IB to give them $125,000,000. This is quite interesting, since we still don't know who the "SECRET" IB is after 7 months, and most importantly, the company still has no financing. However, they do have a debt payment due the end of this month in the neighborhood of $125,000.00, plus the money they still owe the IRS. I am curious as to how Suzanne can say the Pennzoil deal is so great, when the history of this companys deals have never amounted to anything. ie. Lifetime Learning, Babe Ruth, Eckert Drugs, the list just goes on and on.

To: TOPFUEL who wrote (43771)	12/16/2000 2:56:57 PM
From: TOPFUEL	Respond to of 44908

Suzanne here is link to my new alias on RB when I post something I want you too see I will use this one otherwise I will continue to use my topfuel69 alias this way you will not be bothered ok. ragingbull.altavista.com Make sure you click on this link above because somebody else made a ReaI_David and if they insult you I do not want you blaming me for it..

To: TOPFUEL who wrote (43771)	12/16/2000 11:02:47 PM
From: Suzanne Newsome	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

David, charity is one of my favorite topics. Why don't we compare Form 1040 Schedule A's. You do itemize, don't you? Do you want to compare contributions in raw dollars or as a percentage of income? Not only did I NOT buy a football card or a UCP card, I did NOT contribute to unwed mothers, hunger in the Far East, homeless shelters in New York, the Sierra Club, or several thousand other charities. But let me know when you want to compare your contributions and volunteer activities with mine. Anytime, bub.