SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Trader who wrote (40900)12/16/2000 5:13:55 PM
From: daryll40  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
I have learned never to predict. However, while the NAZ IS down in the same range as the DOW was in 1973-4, the OVERALL market as measured by the Wilshire 5000 is not in that range. And while the bloom IS off the rose, things are not nearly as bad as then. For one thing, energy as a percent of expenses (homes, business) is less so even the recent doubling is not AS BAD as '73-4. In that time period, we had a "cancer on the Presidency" while this time we had mere indigestion that appears to have cleared quickly. And Greenspan, for all the moaning about him, has proven in recent economies to correctly balance the inflation/recession risks over the long run, even if our AMAT is pounded from 115 to who knows where in the process.

Daryll40



To: John Trader who wrote (40900)12/16/2000 7:17:52 PM
From: Gottfried  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
John, you asked for comments: when the mood gets more bearish, more bears appear and those who make a living from their prognostications see a lot of competition. So they set themselves apart by sounding MORE BEARISH than the rest. [i.e. comparisons to Japan, to 1929, NASDAQ at 1200 etc].

Happens every time. Right now nobody but A.G. knows.

Gottfried