Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Freedom Fighter who wrote (87055)	12/17/2000 9:32:10 AM
From: accountclosed	Respond to of 132070

wayne, i agree and he is doing a good job of rehabilitating his image on fox, imo.

To: Freedom Fighter who wrote (87055)	12/17/2000 12:41:57 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

wayne, we'll disagree on newt ;-) >>The dems simply have no value for "choice" except in the areas that suit them...<< yes. what has bill clinton really given up to "help the poor?" they bought a $1.4 million home in new york. remember when clinton sang the woes about making $32k / year as arkansas governor and being happy about it? remember he said he didn't think in terms of millions of dollars> he lied. 'magine that? hillary is pocketing $8 million. guess what? if bush lowers taxes then i bet she pays less in tax. the democratic party is extremely dishnoest, imho. why is it that the republicans put an african american in the supreme court b4 the demicrats? why is it the republicans put an african american as secretary of state and the demicrats don't? i'm not extolling the virtues of the republicans b/c i think they can be extremely mean spirited if left to their own devices, but i am exposing the democrats as being hypocrits. this is why i extremely dislike both parties. sure, screw me. but don't expect me to actively work to give you the opportunity to screw me. the mass dilusion is AMAZING!

To: Freedom Fighter who wrote (87055)	12/17/2000 2:17:52 PM
From: Shane M	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Wayne, I agree with you on Gingrich. I feel like the guy was one of the most brightest, most forward thinkers in congress. Interviews/discussions with him on C-Span reveal a depth of thought (a visionary?) not present in many of today's politicians. His downfall IMHO was his intense partisanship. Gingrich became obsessed with burying Clinton when he should've been progressing positively with the legislative majority the pubs had secured in congress. Shane