Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Left Wing Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (1401)	12/18/2000 1:30:30 AM
From: bonnuss_in_austin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6089

Tim: You must be an unemployed white male, ... from what I gather from this post of yours. <g> It's the only one I've opened as you addressed it to me. (Kinda rushed for time plus, just scanning your 'headlines' here, appears you're 'one of them.') <g> Just a quickie <g> ... nope, I don't consider an unborn fetus to be a human being, fer starters. Unborn is unborn. Same as dead is dead. On the other end of the life cycle. Again, I keep coming back to the notion that conservatives want to force all women to give birth after conception. Then, there is no 'follow-thru.' How do all you great humanist liberals justify the fact that you don't want to PAY MONEY for those new human beings' financial survival? The conundrum is that you wish to cut the welfare payments, etc. No Republican conservatives want to deal with the COSTS of raising new human beings who would be brought into this world against the wishes of the parents. ????????????????????????? 'b-i-a' ###