Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Left Wing Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (1402)	12/17/2000 11:30:11 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6089

Tim, the NYT editorial page is nothing like the WSJ editorial page. The Times has some diversity in the op-ed columns, and old Times hand A.M. Rosenthal actually called for Clinton's resignation. I find it inconceivable that anybody writing editorially for the WSJ would ever come out for anything equivalent for a conservative. And the National Review has to be the very definition of superciliousness. They don't argue, they preach to the converted. And spare me the constitutional lecture. The founding fathers believed in government by the propertied class, as do modern day conservatives. So what? Took a civil war to fix what was wrong with the strictly constructed constitutionalism the U.S. started out with, and it took another 100 years for the Supreme Court to actually take the civil war amendments to the constitution seriously.