Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (48909)	12/18/2000 9:22:16 PM
From: Monty Lenard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Well I hope they do rally it 500 at least I would know to go short. I recently overlayed a chart of the Japanese bubble (1990) top over the Naz and it is really something to behold. It took them approx 4 1/2 years to go from 10k to 40k and it took us about the same time to go from 1k to 5k. When you look at the early stages of their sell off it pretty well mirrors what we are seeing in the naz. MOnty

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (48909)	12/18/2000 9:49:59 PM
From: Wyätt Gwyön	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

at what level could the NAZ(or the SnP for that matter) possibly be considered severely undervalued? If fair value is in the range of 1000 to 1300 on the Naz, then half of that would be 500 to 650. Is 50% undervalued severe?