Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PROLIFE who wrote (117616)	12/18/2000 9:51:26 PM
From: Jumper	Respond to of 769670

Who was the last man of the year? Oh...that buthead CEO of Amazon.

To: PROLIFE who wrote (117616)	12/18/2000 10:28:14 PM
From: Cola Can	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Well not to worry, all you disenfranchised folks, JJJakson will be having "rallyes" all across the country. After Bush's first two appointees, any rally by JJackson, will be a fool's play. The democrats don't really know how bad they are appearing right now. JJ is doing more damage to the democrats and basiclly no damage to Bush. Every whine, every spin is exploding in their face. Even the attempts to paint Bush in a negative light is not even sticking. If morals were a needed character to get elected, no democrat would ever be elected. Bush has won the election. He has won the people of the country. I heard a joke the other day: What is the difference between a liberal and a litter of puppies? After five days, the puppies open their eyes and stop whinning. Truth is, no poll, no evidence, no whinning, no rallies, is going to undermine Bush. I do want to see a tremendous turn out and crying, when Bush is sworn in. The democrat party is dead now. A few good kicks by liberal extremist, for good measure, will be ok. The democrats think 2002 will be a great democrat turnout. I doubt it. There wont be a democrat elected. The republicans will be in force and there wont be any felons or dead people voting, or double voting going on, like this past election.

To: PROLIFE who wrote (117616)	12/19/2000 9:37:21 AM
From: mst2000	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

I had no doubt that Bush's electors would "hold true" -- after all, they are his MOST committed supporters (some of you should be committed, but that's another story). What interested me is the latest reports this morning showing that, with absentee ballots counted after the election now included, the most current tallies show Gore's lead widening -- he is ahead by over 530,000 votes nationally - not the 300,000 previously reported but 530,000+. So as you ponder your boy in the White House, and gloat for benefit of the rest of us, and you wonder why people won't accept his legitimacy, just remember that he lost the national vote by the widest margin of any President who ever finished second but won the electoral vote, he lost by approximately 5 times the margin that Kennedy beat Nixon by, and if memory serves, by more than the margin Nixon beat Humphrey by. And that he had to steal Florida with the help of 5 ideologues on the Supreme Court to do it. They are counting in Florida now. When the results of that review are complete, the illegitimacy of the Bush presidency will be underscored for the world to see. Hail to the thief.