Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Home on the range where the buffalo roam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mishedlo who wrote (7694)	12/19/2000 12:41:15 AM
From: Boplicity	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13572

You and I define what a base is differently. Take QCOM for example. I see QCOM's base to be from 110 to the 50's. So when I say base building I don't mean flat-line. 2200 is my lowest of lows for the Naz. Right now I don't think 2200 will happen unless the CSCO needs to be cut in half and EMC needs to have PC like PE's. It all depends on what the FED says, more so then what they do. The FED words are by far more omnipotent then their action. greg

To: mishedlo who wrote (7694)	12/19/2000 8:48:09 AM
From: bonnuss_in_austin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13572

Mishedlo: Big high 5 on CIEN & RIMM... ...I too hold mar/apr puts on both. (Tried to get some C puts yesterday -- CMVs -- Jan 42.50 -- @ 1/2; no go. Going to look at again today and probably will go a bit further out) The more I look at RIMM, the more I want to bet the farm on its demise ... look at the P/E ratio, mish: -- 1400! Geez, it's GOT to get decimated ... don't you think? finance.yahoo.com What strikes, etc are your BRCD puts? TIA, 'b-i-a' ###