SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Piffer OT - And Other Assorted Nuts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (61965)12/19/2000 2:39:26 PM
From: Atin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 63513
 
Is it or is it not a change in bias? They didn't explicitly say they were changing the bias, just that they were going to be vigilant . . . the markets tanked because CNBC said there was no change anywhere, then they bounced when they realized that the language seemed to imply a change in bias and now they're falling again -- because maybe people are realizing they didn't actually say they were changing the bias! Do they normally say what they're doing? Explicitly?

I was just reminded that they don't explicitly cite a bias anymore. So I guess this is a change in bias. Markets decided to go lower.
-A



To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (61965)12/19/2000 3:23:21 PM
From: Rich1  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 63513
 
We are nearing that 2523 mark onthe COMP where we bounced at the end of November..
That BTW is the 50 percent retracement off the old highs..
Who has the guts to play it???


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News