Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mst2000 who wrote (117933)	12/19/2000 6:58:21 PM
From: SecularBull	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Where do the Florida Legislative and Executive branches go for relief and redress in your perfect world? LoF

To: mst2000 who wrote (117933)	12/19/2000 7:43:24 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

You believe what you want. 7 SC justices disagree with your view of what is constitutional and 5 disagree with your view of remedy. I think that makes you the one who can't understand the law.

To: mst2000 who wrote (117933)	12/19/2000 8:18:44 PM
From: Selectric II	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Are you kidding? From your statements, it seems you would agree that if the Florida legislature passed a law that its electors would be chosen exclusively by white, heterosexual men between the ages of 42 and 65, who are also card-carrying members of either the Nazi Party or the Ku Klux Klan, there would be no role for the federal courts in determining the constitutionality of that statute. Unless I misinterpreted your post, I think you're wrong about federal court jurisdiction here.