Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thehammer who wrote (117977)	12/19/2000 8:39:15 PM
From: donjuan_demarco	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

GWB -- Disgrace -- Abomination -- AntiChrist??? Is GWB the Anti-Christ? Well, 2000 years of prophecy say that he is: prophecy.com It is said that the presidency of GWB will lead to "abominations throughout the land, and cats sleeping with dogs." I hope that you are ready to face disasters of Biblical proportions ... for the Apocalyse is surely upon us. God save us all.

To: Thehammer who wrote (117977)	12/19/2000 9:58:06 PM
From: asenna1	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

Sandra Day O'Connor - Reuters December 18, 2000 NEW YORK -- Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor was upset during an election-night party when she heard Florida was first called for Vice President Al Gore, exclaiming, "This is terrible," according to a report in Newsweek magazine released yesterday. The report said O'Connor made the comment at about 8 p.m. Nov. 7, and declared that meant the election was "over" because Gore had also won two other key states. Quoting two eyewitnesses to her comments, Newsweek said O'Connor then walked off to get a plate of food, and her husband, John, explained to friends and acquaintances that she was upset because they wanted to retire to Arizona and a Gore presidency meant they would have to wait at least four years because she did not want a Democrat to name her successor. O'Connor, 70, had been Republican majority leader of the Arizona state Senate before being appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court by President Reagan in 1981. The magazine said in its edition due out today her remarks would likely fuel criticism that high court justices "sought to influence" election returns in their ruling that ended the impasse over the presidential election. Nothing partisan here as I would sure hate to see an election. much less a recount, foul up her retirement plans.