Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Aurora Platinum Corp, ARP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (16)	12/20/2000 9:34:46 PM
From: 1st.mate	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 157

Stock is drifting lower on loww volume. I would think that this will tumble if it gets much lower. I ask as I am looking for a place to go long...Were do you see a place to cover? or did you short yet?

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (16)	12/21/2000 11:53:24 PM
From: hank2010	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 157

Elizabeth; Regarding avalon, when I questioned the narrow width you replied "If Avalon's surface grades hold up on a structure that is less than 1/2 metre thick it will be economic. Its hard to say because I haven't seen the assay sheet but it could be that this small structure could be equivalent to 75 grams of gold or about US$600 per tonne. That should be minable." Of prime interest to me are the keel targets, but MSK reported on the Pyrrhotite Lake prospect an intersection of 1.9metres of 24.2 g/t pgm (mostly pd) +10% Cu amd 7.86% nickel. That is close to $1200 at to-day's prices. Even with a 5.5% royalty it is still worth more than $1130/tonne. If they are successful, I think it would be undg. although with the size of the targets it could be multiple mines, both undg and open pit. I disagree that it is a lay down. Hank