SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Silicon Investor, Life After Infospace??? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: AugustWest who wrote (3)12/20/2000 4:35:54 PM
From: Shoot1st  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 35
 
let's make it a limited partnership.....

at least we'll know how bad were getting screwed before we cut the check.......

SHootie



To: AugustWest who wrote (3)12/20/2000 6:45:57 PM
From: Don Green  Respond to of 35
 
Does anyone remember how Infospace paid for G02NET?

I assume it was a pure stock deal which means GO2NET investors lost big time. Wasn't Paul Allen a BIG investor in Go2Net?

Getting real ugly

InfoSpace Executive Sues Company
SEATTLE, Dec 20, 2000 (AP Online via COMTEX) -- A senior InfoSpace Inc. executive has sued the Internet company and its chairman under federal racketeering laws, saying it reneged on a promise to give him more stock options than any other employee.

John E. Richards, vice president of merchant services for online content supplies, said in a lawsuit filed in federal court Tuesday that the company's chairman, Naveen Jain, repeatedly lured executives with unfulfilled promises of stock options.

"We intend to prove that later, when these employees were no longer of immediate use to him, those options were denied," Richards' lawyer, Steve Berman, wrote in the complaint.

Richards said he was given options to buy 125,000 shares as an incentive to join InfoSpace and build an online telephone and merchant directory in 1998. He later learned some employees were given options for many more shares.

He is suing for unspecified damages, court costs and an adjustment to ensure he receives more options than any other employee.

Jain refused to comment, but company spokesman Mark Peterson said, "We believe these allegations are totally without merit and plan to vigorously defend our position using all appropriate legal means."

The lawsuit cites similar allegations by six other top executives at the Internet portal. Two of those cases were settled for a combined $15 million.

Richards' case is the only one filed under the Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act. While often associated with organized crime, RICO is also used to prosecute other types of fraud.

The suit claims Jain told Richards that their agreement did not need to be put in writing because if it were, it might make other employees envious.

Jain also instituted a policy forbidding employees to discuss their stock options, the lawsuit says.

In a 1998 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, InfoSpace acknowledged its procedures for granting options to new employees were not clearly documented.

"In light of the receipt of the above claims, there can be no assurance that the company will not receive similar claims in the future from one or more individuals asserting rights to acquire common stock," the filing said.

According to SEC documents, Jain placed 1 million shares of his stock into escrow to indemnify the company and its directors.

On Wednesday, shares of InfoSpace fell $1.61, or 20.5 percent, to close at $6.25 in a broad selloff on the Nasdaq Stock Market.



To: AugustWest who wrote (3)2/6/2001 8:48:44 PM
From: sandintoes  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35
 
I would contribute, but I lost all my money on INSP.