Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: slacker711 who wrote (90590)	12/20/2000 4:32:33 PM
From: Cooters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Slacker, <<Of course, at the current rate, the NAZ will be at zero by then ;-).... >> I pulled up a quote on Q one morning last week and it showed a low of zero. I say we've been on quite a roll since then.<gg> Cooters

To: slacker711 who wrote (90590)	12/20/2000 4:32:51 PM
From: Ibexx	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Slacker, Another personal speculation of mine regarding the lack of rate cut. I suppose it's no secret that Bush Sr. and Grinchspan weren't the best of buddies. To this day Bush Sr. blamed AG for contributing to his 1992 defeat by refusing to lower the rate at a crucial time, thus causing the 1991-1992 recession. Bush Jr, in my opinion, has no more clout than daddy in pursuing AG to get up to speed. Additionally, I thought all the noise Bush Jr. and his handlers made in the last few days (about tax cuts and weak economy etc) was extremely UNWISE, in that it may have pushed AG further to a corner. AG seems to have an ego to match the size of his brains. It would seem to me that the rate cut, when it does come, should look like Fed's decision, not anyone else's. Aibesuku@springnotfaraway.com