Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zoltan! who wrote (118499)	12/21/2000 1:43:14 PM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 769670

I believe, were you to do deeper research in the areas cited by the Texas researcher and the Yale researcher, both of whom are likely connected to Bush in some way (did they donate to his campaign, for example?), you'd find quite a different story. The stats from Philly are flawed and inconsistent with what's on record from the board of registration; the judge in Missouri made a call based on disenfrancisement where voters weren't allowed to vote and kept the polls open so they could; and the handing out of cigarettes in Wisconsin is not different than Bush offering scallops wrapped in bacon to fatcats. Were I having a conversation with homeless folks, I'd give out some cigarettes also in order to gain their confidence. Anyway, all of the examples cited, in the Murdoch-owned NYPost Op-Ed writing, pale in comparison to how the Bushes, with the state's top election official(s), rigged Florida against Gore. And I remind you that Florida was the difference in the election. It was long predicted before the vote that Florida, along with Pennsylvania and Michigan were the key states to victory.

To: Zoltan! who wrote (118499)	12/21/2000 1:43:14 PM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 769670

I believe, were you to do deeper research in the areas cited by the Texas researcher and the Yale researcher, both of whom are likely connected to Bush in some way (did they donate to his campaign, for example?), you'd find quite a different story. The stats from Philly are flawed and inconsistent with what's on record from the board of registration; the judge in Missouri made a call based on disenfrancisement where voters weren't allowed to vote and kept the polls open so they could; and the handing out of cigarettes in Wisconsin is not different than Bush offering scallops wrapped in bacon to fatcats. Were I having a conversation with homeless folks, I'd give out some cigarettes also in order to gain their confidence. Anyway, all of the examples cited, in the Murdoch-owned NYPost Op-Ed writing, pale in comparison to how the Bushes, with the state's top election official(s), rigged Florida against Gore. And I remind you that Florida was the difference in the election. It was long predicted before the vote that Florida, along with Pennsylvania and Michigan were the key states to victory.

To: Zoltan! who wrote (118499)	12/21/2000 1:43:14 PM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 769670

I believe, were you to do deeper research in the areas cited by the Texas researcher and the Yale researcher, both of whom are likely connected to Bush in some way (did they donate to his campaign, for example?), you'd find quite a different story. The stats from Philly are flawed and inconsistent with what's on record from the board of registration; the judge in Missouri made a call based on disenfrancisement where voters weren't allowed to vote and kept the polls open so they could; and the handing out of cigarettes in Wisconsin is not different than Bush offering scallops wrapped in bacon to fatcats. Were I having a conversation with homeless folks, I'd give out some cigarettes also in order to gain their confidence. Anyway, all of the examples cited in the Murdoch-owned NYPost Op-Ed pale in comparison to how the Bushes, with the state's top election official(s), rigged Florida against Gore. And I remind you that Florida was the difference in the election. It was long predicted before the vote that Florida, along with Pennsylvania and Michigan were the key states to victory.

To: Zoltan! who wrote (118499)	12/21/2000 1:44:46 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

I believe, were you to do deeper research in the areas cited by the Texas researcher and the Yale researcher, both of whom are likely connected to Bush in some way (did they donate to his campaign, for example?), you'd find quite a different story. The stats from Philly are flawed and inconsistent with what's on record from the board of registration; the judge in Missouri made a call based on disenfrancisement where voters weren't allowed to vote and kept the polls open so they could; and the handing out of cigarettes in Wisconsin is not different than Bush offering scallops wrapped in bacon to fatcats. Were I having a conversation with homeless folks, I'd give out some cigarettes also in order to gain their confidence. Anyway, all of the examples cited, in the Murdoch-owned NYPost Op-Ed writing, pale in comparison to how the Bushes, with the state's top election official(s), rigged Florida against Gore. And I remind you that Florida was the difference in the election. It was long predicted before the vote that Florida, along with Pennsylvania and Michigan were the key states to victory.