To: StockDung who wrote (3506 ) 12/21/2000 7:07:12 PM From: DanZ Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5582 For the record, I had absolutely nothing to do with my analysis ending up on that website. Whoever created that website didn't even tell me that they were going to copy my analysis or add my email address to the report. In fact, when I first saw the post on Yahoo about that website, I didn't even read it because I didn't recognize the alias who posted it, and I thought it was off topic spam. I read it after somebody called me and told me that the text of my analysis was on that website. The bottom line is that IMO the report fairly and conservatively estimates how Gum Tech will perform next year. If anyone disagrees, they are welcome to provide comments. Also, Credit Suisse First Boston would not be involved with this company if they didn't see the potential or have respect for Gum Tech's business plan and products. I suspect that one day CSFB will initiate coverage of GUMM with a buy rating and publish a research report, and that will put an end to the nonsense from most of the shorts. I thought about replying to Hank's last post here, but it isn't worth it and I just put him on ignore instead. Anybody who reads my posts and his posts knows what a hypocritical transparent fool he is. PS to LieTeller: I haven't counted your messages on this thread, but I would guess that you have posted more times on this thread in two months than any long has posted since this thread started. And to top it off, the preponderance of your posts aren't even relevant to what is happening at Gum Tech today. You are the king of hype and spam, but it's ok with Hank since you don't like this company. Merry Christmas to all.