SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : SILICON STORAGE SSTI Flash Mem -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Madarasz who wrote (1428)12/21/2000 2:03:04 PM
From: 5handicap  Respond to of 1881
 
John, can you help me with that..because what I see in the first column in bold is $23.5M Total Cash from Operating Activities. However I will be the first to admit I am not an accountant. So if the cash flow from their core business (operating activities, not selling stock) is plus 23 million, why exactly do they not have a positive cash flow...?



To: John Madarasz who wrote (1428)12/21/2000 4:22:37 PM
From: hueyone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1881
 
John, Thanks for bringing up that cash flow statement:

marketguide.com

As Scott has noted, the company recently went free cash flow positive. In fact the company is now free cash flow positive over the last nine month period given on your link. This is very impressive for a young emerging semiconductor company. Neither ATML or STM are free cash flow positive over the same nine months.

Free cash flow = total cash provided by operating activities less acquisition costs of property and equipment. For the nine months ending September 30, 2000 free cash flow equals 23.5 million less 7 million in capital expenditures. That equals 16.5 million. This is quite good for a young, rapidly growing semiconductor company that has only been profitable for five quarters.

Again, thanks for bringing SST's excellent postive free cash flow to the thread's attention.

Best, Huey



To: John Madarasz who wrote (1428)12/21/2000 4:30:44 PM
From: Sam  Respond to of 1881
 
john,
This company just started making money last year. They had 6.2m of non-operating income, and $68m of income in the first nine months of this year. They do not make "money from selling stock..." They finance their growth by selling stock, yes. And yes, they filed for a secondary a few months, when the stock was triple what it is now, because they saw large opportunities ahead of them. It is hardly uncommon for a company growing like a weed to need financing from the secondary market--exactly what purpose do you think these markets serve? This isn't like a I-nut company (and certainly not an incubator company like CMGI) that is financing their revenue by attaching a 10 dollar bill to each product that they are selling for $20 (see, e.g. Lexar, a flash card company, for an example of that sort of company). If their SEC statements are legit--and I have no reason to believe that they aren't--then they have been making good money selling their products, and reinvesting that money back into their business, like any business that is growing rapidly should. You may argue that they are trying to grow too fast, and maybe that is so--certainly that is the disease that has afflicted a lot of companies over the past few years with disastrous results. But to say that they make their money by selling debt and stock is wrong.

However, it clearly is still a "show me" company. They need a history of making money for a couple of years in a row, and they need to show that Superflash is indeed scalable, as they maintain, that the low density market is viable long term, and that they can also crack the high density market, if they are indeed to be among the three or four largest flash companies. IMHO.
s.