SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : PROPAGANDA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KLP who wrote (163)12/21/2000 8:25:02 PM
From: Vendit™  Respond to of 318
 
An excellent propaganda illustration!

I too have been watching the news cover up the economy news.
Energy prices are the key and I think Bush has a fair understanding of how the oil markets work.

<g>



To: KLP who wrote (163)12/21/2000 10:14:43 PM
From: Carolyn  Respond to of 318
 
===========================================================
Character and Principle – The North Star of Our Republic
Diane Alden
Dec. 19, 2000

In his acceptance speech on December 13, George W. Bush said character and principle are paramount to
his future presidency. Unfortunately, the media thought he said that only unity, conciliation and
bipartisanship matter.
The question then becomes is this all moot anyway? All the arguments and partisan infighting, is it all
moot? Do values of character and principle count for anything in United States 2000? Or have we become
a nation of little character and no principle, adrift and caught in the winds of chance, a ship with no
rudder and no direction?

The left, that includes the press, Al Gore, the Clintons and far too many Democrats, think that our basic
principles are "flexible," which means we have become relativists in matters of right and wrong and that
there is no agreement any longer on what those concepts mean. We are only as good and as strong as the
degree to which we can make our opinions the prevailing truth.

Whether we are Republican or Democrat, do we now merely pay lip service to our guiding principles? Do
these principles only mean as much as the last election, the last sound bite by political hacks and
opportunists, the last foolish plan by the control-freak world elite to make the state into the image of a
god?

From the U.N. to various NGOs, Planned Parenthood to Hollywood, among unthinking U.S. politicians of
both parties, American principles are being decided in cold calculation that is destructive to the
intentions of the Founders as seen in the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.

Because America is no longer sure of herself and her principles, she is open to influences that are not only
destructive to liberty but also downright evil – an evil couched in euphemisms of peace, love,
brotherhood, and the environment. These are nothing but warmed-over collectivist intentions, and those
who believe in them will use police-state methods to accomplish their ends. Anyone who doubts that
should read U.N. Agenda 21 and its list of supporters. That document states that some form of coercion
may be used to get compliance, and there are Americans, especially on the left, who support that
document. This is not American principle, this is new world order totalitarianism.

Since the '60s in particular, America has lost confidence, and as we did, we became vulnerable to every
guilt trip and every folly that came our way. From environmentalism to radical gender and identity
politics, America is lost because it no longer follows its guiding principles.

So it is over the years that Gramscian Marxism, political correctness, new age new world order folly have
marched through our institutions and soured and destroyed our attitudes toward what constitutes liberty.
The politically correct crowd, the progressives and misbegotten idealists, have pushed us, Americans in
favor of the Bill of Rights, into a corner. They did this by telling us our basic beliefs and institutions were
less than perfect and in need of serious fixing, and we believed them.

They accuse conservatives of every vile and cruel aspect of human nature, from being racists and Hitlerian
to being greedy and thoughtless about the poor. The left refuses to recognize the nature of their own
beliefs and attitudes as something less than perfect. They think that they are the idealistic, moral, and
therefore wise and good individuals and movement.

They don't see individuals, they see groups, and that is why they are collectivists and statists. That is why,
in the end, their way will be the only way unless it is brought down. Of all the oddities in the world, the
left, which accuses the right of being totalitarian in its base and core, is more so. It has no clue, nor can it
believe, that it is closer to the fascism of Hitler than it is to the republican and enlightened understanding
of man and governance as laid down in our Bill of Rights and Constitution.

It should come as no surprise, then, that our leftist mainstream media hear President-elect George W.
Bush calling for bipartisanship and unity, but do not hear him mention character and principle.
Bipartisanship and unity is nothing but newspeak informing conservatives and Republicans that they will
have to roll over for a leftist-statist agenda – again.

Half of America voted for Bush and it wants to hear about principle, the Bill of Rights and doing the right
thing by the Constitution and the United States. The other half wants to hear about more stuff from
government and a collectivist agenda. Thus, we are all hearing what we want to hear.

Nonetheless, the problem remains that Bush will have to choose what is most important for this country.
The gray center is unprincipled unity and compliance with whatever the left wants or the media demand –
that same media which will keep harping on GWB's legitimacy as president until he is out of office. They
will demand from him a leftist agenda and demonize him when he performs and acts on conservative
agenda and the people who voted for him.

If George Bush and Dick Cheney pay them any mind at all, what is left of liberty and republican values, or
any notion of this country as a free nation, will be doomed. We will have indeed capitulated to the left's
statist and collectivist ideas and policies and agenda without a fight. This country will have foundered and
lost the last remnants of American principles of freedom for the individual and the blessing of a limited
state.

Now is not the time to talk about bipartisanship. Now is the time to talk about what is right and about
undoing the damage of eight years of someone who has no respect for the Bill of Rights or the
Constitution. Never mind the rule of law, because that is nearly a dead issue. Judges and courts have
trampled the rule of law time and time again, and the Florida Supreme Court is one of thousands of
examples of that fact in our country today.

We have had eight years of corruption and bashing the rule of law by Clinton, Al Gore and Janet Reno, the
Democrats, and many Republicans. We have had eight years of wrangling and stealing and breaking faith
with our basic ideals and institutions. There is no room for bipartisanship on principle at this time. There
is no room for magnanimity in the face of venal corruption and wholesale breaking of the law by the
highest officials in our land.

GWB won with the prayers and support of the great decent people of flyover country. If he forgets that, he
will lose it all in a short time. No one expects perfection from him, but we all want to think that he will
attempt to steer the ship of state back to safe harbor, where the Bill of Rights and the Constitution are the
North Star of our republic.

The rule of the North Star is grounded in its constancy. It is the only star in the heavens that does not
appear to move. Mariners have used it for millennia when there were no other means to set a course. So
you fix your eyes on it and follow it, and if you stay the course, you will find your way home. "For I am as
constant as the North Star, whose true, fixed, and resting quality there is no fellow in the firmament."
(William Shakespeare)

Our North Star represents the republican values of liberty and the rights of the individual over the state,
which include all those values and principles contained in the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.
Following that star requires steadfastness regardless of those other less constant 'stars' such as security
and selfishness and going along to get along.

It is my fondest hope that GWB will follow and uphold liberty and constitutional republican values,
wherever they may lead us. Only in that way will we find our true selves as Americans and as human
beings.

Follow the North Star of character and principle, GWB. That is what a good captain of any ship lost at sea
would do. Follow that star, and it will lead us home.

(Check out the new interactive zone at www.aldenchronicles.com and additions to the International Beat.
Enter Diane's contest to choose a topic for her upcoming book, write a response to flamer of the week, and
also let her know your opinion about whether Bush should pardon Bill OR Hillary and whether
Republicans should play "let's make a deal.")

------------------------------
Diane Alden is a research analyst with a background in political science and economics. Her work has
appeared in the Washington Times as well as NewsMax.com, Etherzone, Enterstageright, American Partisan
and many other online publications. She also does occasional radio commentaries for Georgia Radio Inc.
Her e-mail address is wulfric8@bellsouth.net.



To: KLP who wrote (163)12/22/2000 7:42:01 AM
From: Vendit™  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 318
 
The media isn't bias. Calling Florida for Gore 6 hours before the election was over was not their fault.

Notice how they include FOX in their retraction statement when this is not true. FOX maintained too close to call all evening and then was the FIRST network to call for Bush.

***************************************************

Errors Plagued Election Night Polling Service
VNS Report Also Faults Networks in Fla. Blunder


The polling organization responsible for the biggest blunder in television history on election night was plagued by a series of errors that distorted the Florida vote all night long, a confidential report concludes.

The internal investigation by Voter News Service also makes clear that its techniques were inherently risky for the networks that rely on its data.

The group had no reliable way of estimating the number of Florida's absentee ballots in the presidential race, which were almost double what it had expected. What's more, the news service dramatically underestimated the number of Florida votes still uncounted at 2 a.m.

"Budget limitations" have "placed heavy burdens on all VNS staff and [have] made the task of covering elections far more difficult than necessary," says the report, a copy of which was obtained by The Washington Post. VNS was created in 1990 as a cost-cutting measure by the major television networks and the Associated Press.

While CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN and Fox decided to project Vice President Gore and, six hours later, George W. Bush the Florida winner -- and had to retract both calls in humiliating fashion -- those decisions were based heavily on bad VNS data.

This was more than just a media embarrassment. The calling of Florida for Gore gave many viewers the impression, especially after the vice president won Michigan and Pennsylvania, that he was on his way to the White House, a situation Republicans say may have discouraged some Bush voters from turning out. The later projection that Bush had won Florida fostered a national mind-set that he had been elected president, which Gore supporters say made their recount battle that much harder.

VNS spokeswoman Lee C. Shapiro said she could not comment on the inquiry.

At 7:50 p.m. on Nov. 7, when the network calls for Gore began, VNS was wildly underestimating the size of Florida's absentee vote. The group thought absentee ballots would make up 7.2 percent of the overall vote, instead of the actual figure of 12 percent.

VNS also projected that absentees would vote 22.4 percent more for Bush than Election Day voters, when the actual figure was 23.7 percent. That mistake alone accounted for 1.3 percentage points of the 7.3 percent lead that Gore was projected to hold at that moment.

VNS was operating in the dark because the organization did no telephone polling in Florida to try to estimate the size and shape of the absentee vote, largely because of "the very considerable costs" involved. The group did such surveys in California, Oregon and Washington because of the traditionally heavy absentee balloting in those states.

"The absentee vote has been growing over the years, and we have had to deal with it in a patchwork method," the report says.

Another 2.8 percentage points of Gore's projected lead was inflated by problems with the exit polls, specifically the sampling of voters in the group's 45 selected precincts. The report says this degree of error is "within the normal range" for exit polls.

The remaining 3.2 percentage points of the Gore lead were due to flaws in the exit poll "model" itself. One of VNS's key techniques is to compare its exit-poll findings to the results of past elections.

VNS says it used Florida Gov. Jeb Bush's 1998 victory as the best predictor of how his brother would fare this year, but that Robert J. Dole's 1996 bid -- more voters turn out in a presidential year -- would have produced a better estimate. There also "may be errors in the past vote file for the 1998 gubernatorial race," the report says.

Finally, VNS uses raw vote totals to help correct any exit-poll errors. At 7:50, the exit poll in Tampa was off by 16 percentage points, inflating Gore's estimated lead. But Tampa and Miami, which had the biggest overstatement of Gore's lead in the exit polls, had not reported any votes at 7:50, leaving VNS unable to modify its errors.

If any one of these four mishaps had not occurred, the report says, VNS might not have called Florida for Gore. While some "bad luck" was involved, says the report by editorial director Murray Edelman, the networks also bear responsibility for making projections without consulting VNS.

"It would appear that calls are being made at the minimum acceptable tolerances for risk, with very little allowance for error," he writes. "If we are to continue in this manner, our decision procedures must be redesigned."

The network projections that Bush had won Florida, and with it the presidency, began at 2:16 a.m. They also were based on bad VNS numbers (although neither the news service nor the AP declared Bush the winner).

At 2:10, with 97 percent of the state's precincts reporting, VNS estimated that there were 179,713 votes outstanding. In fact, more than 359,000 votes came in after 2:10. In Palm Beach County alone, VNS projected there were 41,000 votes outstanding, but 129,000 votes came in.

This was compounded by local problems with reporting the vote. At 2:08, Gore's total in Volusia County mysteriously dropped by more than 10,000 votes, while nearly 10,000 votes were added to Bush's total. This mistake boosted Bush's lead by 20,348 votes, giving him a 51,433-vote lead over Gore -- or so VNS believed.

Brevard County later increased Gore's total by 4,000, with none for Bush, in what appeared to be a correction of an earlier mistake. Given the tightness of the contest, Edelman writes, "I was very concerned to see the race called by the networks."

Among other problems, VNS's quality-control system was so inadequate that it failed to reject an early report that 95 percent of Duval County had voted for Gore.

And thanks to exit-poll samples that are smaller than the networks used before VNS was created, "there is some evidence that we overstated the size of the black vote and underestimated the size of the Cuban vote in Florida, and both of these errors could have contributed to the overstatement of the vote for Gore."

Network executives and anchors have repeatedly apologized for their election night mistakes and launched internal inquiries. ABC says it will insulate its decision desk from competitive pressures and describe all future projections as estimates. Fox says it will probably drop VNS and start a new polling consortium.

washingtonpost.com