SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pedro Joaristi who wrote (26755)12/21/2000 3:14:32 PM
From: Dealer  Respond to of 65232
 
CMRC--Commerce One Tumbles After Potential Customer Slips Away
By Joe Bousquin
Senior Writer
12/20/00 10:28 AM ET
Shares of Commerce One (CMRC:Nasdaq - news) were trading sharply lower Wednesday as one of the company's potential new customers signed instead with a rival.

Lately, shares were off $5.22, or 17%, to $25.78.

On Wednesday, VerticalNet (VERT:Nasdaq - news) announced that its technology would power Internet marketplace Converge, formerly known as eHitex, which is being set up by major technology companies such as Hewlett-Packard (HWP:NYSE - news) and Compaq (CPQ:NYSE - news). VerticalNet said it would receive $107.5 million over three years for the deal. VerticalNet also sold its NECX computer chip exchange unit to Converge.

But the Converge exchange was supposed to go to Commerce One. The company had been working with Converge since July, and Commerce One touted the exchange as a major victory at a September conference, when it said it was doing pilot transactions for the marketplace. But apparently, it didn't have a definitive agreement to power the exchange. Commerce One officials couldn't be reached to comment.

"Obviously, this is not good news for [Commerce One] because it is a loss of $108 million over the next three years and denies them of any revenue sharing from the potentially lucrative marketplace," Goldman Sachs analyst Thomas Berquist wrote in a research note. He noted that it probably won't affect Commerce One's current quarter, though. "However," he continued, "we believe that since [Commerce One] will not be involved in the exchange, it tightens their wiggle room to meet or exceed estimates in future quarters. The Converge relationship would have contributed 4% ($35 million) of [Commerce One] revenues in 2001." (He has Commerce One on the firm's recommended list, its highest rating, and Goldman hasn't done underwriting for the company.)

Wall Street's harsh lesson for the company? Don't count your exchange customers before they're signed.



To: Pedro Joaristi who wrote (26755)12/21/2000 3:14:40 PM
From: bosquedog  Respond to of 65232
 
Anybody know what is going on with CMRC?

CMRC: from yesterday

thestreet.com



To: Pedro Joaristi who wrote (26755)12/21/2000 3:17:27 PM
From: Dealer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
I posted this yesterday:

CMRC--Geez! Commerce One Inc CMRC Thomas Weisel from Buy
to Market Perform History
Can you believe these wanna be's downgraded CMRC after it has fallen 75%......

They need to get a red phone to "Phychic Hot Line".

dealie



To: Pedro Joaristi who wrote (26755)12/21/2000 3:27:57 PM
From: edamo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
pj..."what's wrong with cmrc"

perhaps it has been discovered that they have a business which probably can't turn a profit....

third party business to business is another internet "pie in the sky, we gonna be rich" concept...

most major corporations have included in their sap or orcl software edi capabilities and have been using same prior to cmrc, arba, and whoever....