SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Chris J. Horne who wrote (11205)12/21/2000 8:57:07 PM
From: geode00  Respond to of 42834
 
Agreed, this is the clearest indication of how faulty he has become. This is really too bad because I trusted his judgment (and took it) until this morning's debacle.



To: Chris J. Horne who wrote (11205)12/21/2000 9:07:56 PM
From: geode00  Respond to of 42834
 
Future expectations. If history holds true then this trade is going south in this way: entry point is now much lower, exit date is further out. The last remaining number is the expected top.

Don't you think it's most reasonable to say that this number will also change and not for the better? That is, if you got in IMMEDIATELY and are holding on for that extended timeframe, you are looking at a potential negative return.

Oh, but you can spread that over a longer timeframe so that's the good news.



To: Chris J. Horne who wrote (11205)1/9/2001 7:26:45 PM
From: Rillinois  Respond to of 42834
 
Chris J. Horne,

Re: Prediction 3: If anyone else had called a trade like this, Bob would describe it as a disaster! My prediction is that Bob will not use this language to describe his own erroneous trade.

Your forecasting continues to have a good track record. Indeed "slightly lower than our original price target" does not equate to calling it a "disaster".

Also, I see that the policy of lowering the entry point is firmly in place. Indeed he has broadened the range enough this time around to suspend this absurd practice unless of course we revisit another millennium on the downside.

Best Regards.

Rillinois



To: Chris J. Horne who wrote (11205)3/12/2001 12:37:05 PM
From: Rillinois  Respond to of 42834
 
Chris J. Horne,

#3 continues to be accurate even after the most recent attempt at explaining the QQQ fiasco.

Best Regards.

Rillinois