Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: REW who wrote (44050)	12/22/2000 10:26:45 AM
From: TOPFUEL	Respond to of 44908

I have also many times placed warnings your full of it all you do is make up stories. this post you just wrote all horseshiet IMHO

To: REW who wrote (44050)	12/22/2000 10:46:53 AM
From: Suzanne Newsome	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Bob, Rich pretty much destroyed the RB thread for any constructive purpose with his "name game." Considering the recent antics on that site, he appears to have set a very destructive precedent. But...not my problem!..........It would appear to me--but I've been labelled as "dense"--that a person who undertook a very unpopular campaign such as denouncing a CEO to the company's stockholders would have expected the barrage of negative feedback that he received. I assume he decided he could take the heat before he ever started the campaign. Rich was proved right about Robert Gordon. For a lot of people the satisfaction would be all they needed to move on. Rich however is just like all the bashers in some ways, they have no tolerance for any leeway in anybody else's thinking. Anybody who doesn't renounce every thought they have ever had and every word they have ever spoken or posted and doesn't lick Rich's shoes, had better be ready for their denunciation. I got off easy; being female I was patronizingly told that I was "nice" but "dense."............I have been critical of Gordon, but I do agree with you in that if he had quit, we could have ended up with worthless shares. Why not use the symbol CATT as a reference to the company with 9 lives? At this moment, what Gordon did is of far less interest to me than what Roix is going to do. Regards, Suzanne

To: REW who wrote (44050)	12/22/2000 12:19:43 PM
From: Dixie77	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Bob, first of all I will no longer be a conduit of any so-called factual information without the words rumor or some such other disclaimer attached, especially since I/we received none during our visit. Looks good & sounds great, but until the information is factual and released through legal apparatus, it's all rumor and innuendo. As to your position (supposedly taking the high road lol) I can only analogize your comment ...I have also stated many times that I will not publicly bash my money. …in the following way; You come home one day and find Gordon actively engaged in bed with your woman. You genteelly back out of the room until they’re completely finished, civilly say goodbye to the scoundrel, wait until he's more than an ears-length away …and then speak sternly to your woman just before sitting down to dinner with her. By the way, just for the record, you have always been, privately as well as publicly, Gordon's pratt boy. You NEVER took an honest position about his thieving ways. NEVER!!! If credibility is what you wanted you should have been there when it counted *...not after he's left the building.* No wonder some people wear pocket protectors.

To: REW who wrote (44050)	12/22/2000 1:34:17 PM
From: JWC	Respond to of 44908

Bob are you still happy that TSIG/TIGI did a R/S that you pushed for?

To: REW who wrote (44050)	12/23/2000 10:50:49 AM
From: Susie924	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 44908

Creating the "name game" on RB enabling 5-8 individuals to dominate the boards into total submission through voluminous aliases with multitudinous users and saying yesterday it was for fun and levity Bob, Are you saying that he finally admitted that he has been responsible for the wonderful cast of characters that have plagued the RB board for the past couple of months? Fun and levity? It amazes me that some people's perception of fun (especially at the expense of others) can be so twisted.