Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : JDS Uniphase (JDSU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Master (Hijacked) who wrote (15337)	12/24/2000 3:09:13 AM
From: Gerald Walls	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24042

Do you think Cramer sold or shorted JDSU prior to his article? Or do you believe he let us in on his opinion before he himself took any action? He has said he has no position in JDSU or SDLI at this time. He hasn't owned JDSU/SDLI for a while now, according to his public statements. If you belive that he has committed the FELONY that you accuse him of then you should file a complaint with the SEC. It should be outrageously simple for them to look at trades transacted for his firm to see if he is trying to manipulate the stock. In fact, it's so simple to be discovered that he'd have to be a complete and utter moron to do it openly like that. The real manipulators are the ones who post under 20 different screen names at Yahoo, Raging Bull, and Silicon Investor.

To: Master (Hijacked) who wrote (15337)	12/24/2000 7:26:13 AM
From: Stocker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24042

Do you think Cramer sold or shorted JDSU prior to his article He's said he has "no position" in the stock. Could it be he's just doing what a good markets writer should do - expressing his opinion and thoughts on the market??? Afterall, isn't that what subscribers to his site pay him for? To think there's manipulation behind all of the man's stories is naive. He'd be investigated in a heartbeat.

To: Master (Hijacked) who wrote (15337)	12/24/2000 7:51:40 AM
From: unix_daemon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 24042

Serious charges you raise against Cramer, Vince. Here's another definition for you: Defamation: Communication which exposes a person to hatred, ridicule, or contempt, lowers him in the esteem of his fellows, causes him to be shunned, or injure him in his business or calling. (Law of Mass Communications, Nelson and Teeter). Of the various ways in which a person may be lowered in the estimation in which he is held, none has brought as many libel suits as a false charge of crime. Is Cramer manipulating stock, Vince?