SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Grandk who wrote (51035)12/24/2000 5:14:46 PM
From: wsringeorgia  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Jason, with KO in addition to the lack of earnings growth there is the "quality of earnings" issue in that lots of KO's "earnings" in the 90's were actually proceeds from the sale of bottlers and other real estate (one time events) and not from the sale of syrup. My family has owned KO for 50 years but we hold almost none now. It has amazed me how well the share price has held up in the face of all this; maybe its a lesson in the power of the banking industry to keep the price of one of their "pets" afloat if they choose. It seems to me that KO is MUCH more overpriced than say INTC or MSFT.

WSR



To: Grandk who wrote (51035)12/24/2000 5:32:35 PM
From: John Lacelle  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
Kenyon,

Sorry...I missed the sarcasm about KO. Ya know, I
used to post things like that about AMZN, DELL, and
YHOO and got flamed to ash on this website. Now that
the cows have come home, I feel vindicated but at the
same time, it was stupid of me to pass up the chance
to make a fortune off the mania. I have learned that
you do pay a premium for any well managed public
company, but a P/E of 80 for syrup is a little high,
in my humble opinion.

-John